Rule of rose composer pro#

Nearly eight years later, the district court struck Rose's answer and entered default judgment, concluding that Rose had abused the discovery and litigation process. ♢ After receiving and investigating referrals concerning Rose's conduct, the Office of Professional Conduct brought an action in the Third District Court. These tribunals called her motion practice “bizarre,” “inscrutable,” “dilatory,” “frivolous,” “legally meritless,” “wholly superfluous,” “utter incomprehensibl,” “unresponsive, immaterial, and redundant,” and “not based in reality.” Over the course of several years, Rose had received multiple warnings from multiple tribunals. The disbarment did not come suddenly, or by surprise. Her disbarment came after the district court struck her answer and entered default judgment against her. ♡ The district court disbarred Susan Rose for violations of Utah's Rules of Professional Conduct in cases Rose handled in both federal and state courts.

Bevis, Billy Walker, Salt Lake City, for appellee

Rule of rose composer pro#

POHLMAN sat.Īttorneys: Susan Rose, pro se, Sandy, for appellant Adam C. Having been recused, JUSTICE HIMONAS does not participate herein COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE JILL N.

JUSTICE PEARCE authored the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE DURRANT, ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE LEE, JUSTICE DURHAM, and JUDGE POHLMAN joined. OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Appellee.